Mesopotamia. Quite a few 'time ago. A Sumerian collecting vegetables in the field. Because there are not the immigrants who do the jobs that nobody wants and since there is still more to do between seasons ago the Sumerian an effort Executioner. Invent the wheel and built a cart. Makes less effort. He is happy. The technology helps the Sumerian to make less effort to do a job. The cart has no brakes, it is heavy to push and do not download songs from iTunes but it does its job. He achieved his goal.
World. Today. Technology has lost sight of the goal. The basic idea is: "an object was invented after → → is the most technologically advanced is better." For example, the ebook came after the book and it even need electricity to function: high technology, it is definitely better. This excludes the fact that a paper book may, for one thing, load any page in no time. Or, if you make a long journey, the book certainly does not end the paper battery. Or if you do not remove the steps near a magnet. But all these arguments are useless against the evidence: the ebook was born after then must be better. Have changed the university's reporting system, everything is digitized. Great, less paper, less waste, Brunetta and Al Gore will be happy. Prior to the verbalization had to print a sticker with all your data, paste it on the record, signature and purpose. Now the teacher makes the data with the computer and the verbalization is done automatically. More comfortable. As long as there is no evidence different from the natural course of things. Such a system is rigid and allows no changes whatsoever, not even their due date. Every time I must have done something other than normal verbalization is necessary to call four people and above all work together to circumvent the rigidity of the system. With the old method, any verbalization took place during the day. With the new method, for extraordinary events, it takes three days. Technological marvels. The computer came after the paper so it must be better. Probably the next step will be oral exams that let you download songs from iTunes. In fact, iTunes 2, which will come after and will undoubtedly be better.
World. Today. Technology has lost sight of the goal. The basic idea is: "an object was invented after → → is the most technologically advanced is better." For example, the ebook came after the book and it even need electricity to function: high technology, it is definitely better. This excludes the fact that a paper book may, for one thing, load any page in no time. Or, if you make a long journey, the book certainly does not end the paper battery. Or if you do not remove the steps near a magnet. But all these arguments are useless against the evidence: the ebook was born after then must be better. Have changed the university's reporting system, everything is digitized. Great, less paper, less waste, Brunetta and Al Gore will be happy. Prior to the verbalization had to print a sticker with all your data, paste it on the record, signature and purpose. Now the teacher makes the data with the computer and the verbalization is done automatically. More comfortable. As long as there is no evidence different from the natural course of things. Such a system is rigid and allows no changes whatsoever, not even their due date. Every time I must have done something other than normal verbalization is necessary to call four people and above all work together to circumvent the rigidity of the system. With the old method, any verbalization took place during the day. With the new method, for extraordinary events, it takes three days. Technological marvels. The computer came after the paper so it must be better. Probably the next step will be oral exams that let you download songs from iTunes. In fact, iTunes 2, which will come after and will undoubtedly be better.
0 comments:
Post a Comment