interview multiple life told by fifty-six words, which intertwine and overlap as might happen when we talk with friends (and often "Sparla") of someone familiar to everyone. Fifty-six items that were it not for the final summary, not even recall at the end of the novel, both are mixed well in a biography tracing the edge of the mythological. An essay on the relativity, as is inevitable when the same story is told by different people. So different that, at some point, it seems that they are not really telling the same story.
Anger embodies all the characteristics of orality and the biography by eliminating the traditional units of space and time. Like any biography, this one is dressed up with numerous anecdotes, stories enhanced by the size of the memory of a personal past that almost is ennobled by the fact of having participated Buster Casey, moreover, "" a dead famous can not turn down the street without seeing one million best friends in real life he never knew .
get to read the novel thinking that more than half of respondents are excited mythomaniac, and then suddenly every event has its space, a space which, however, goes beyond time. Vital to the novel is the concept of relative time, without which we could introduce the subject of relativity ego. is vital for the plot, it is vital for the portrait of the protagonist who is always present, in the words and memories, but also physically present himself in more places and at different times, as if the mass responsible for curvature of spacetime. And in this reality on the multiplicity involved in a whirlwind of events - places - when it is basically free to choose "if" and "who" believe. No one mind, or all lies. But in the end " when everyone starts to tell the same lie, then it is not a lie. No more . "
Mariafrancesca Scilipoti
between the lies
0 comments:
Post a Comment