I tried, really. I tried not to write about it. But they insist, continue, feed my desire to say something. The conclusion is clear from these lines: they have won on my self-control. Sarah Scazzi. Damn her. All the people who do not know now loves. Everyone talks about it, every program, every newspaper, every website information, any social network. There is dancing in a university reform obscene, but it is not important. The government is on the verge of collapse, but it is not important. Unemployment is the highest, but it is not important. There is only Sarah. If you did not disappear forty days before pulling out of the hat, this would be if Sarah is not no crap. But here it is, the news increased up to the hype and when the miracle happens (are the body) is all a burst of tears, sweet phrases on Facebook, YouTube tributes in his honor. You know what an honor to the memory, a video uploaded to YouTube by a stranger. Thanks a lot. And then the death threats to his uncle, give it to the people, kill him, hang him, yes, because he must die, why do not respect life. Kill those who do not respect life. Kill. Those who do not respect life. There are problems in the logical implications. Not to mention that now the uncle is now the ogre uncle for any news or Facebook user, before the confession, before the test, before trial. These people, who claim the same innocence until the third grade of trial, the same as defending Berlusconi even after major final judgments in this case, no, no, he killed a little girl who did not even know and never would have known, and so should be hanged. Killed. Tortured. Torn. And now also the cousin, the first victim, then the police and now the question is already a murderer to be buried next to his father. Views that change in a flash on a crime that has ruined a person. Guest that never change on people who ruin a nation. Both assessments of the same group of people. Still problems of logic. Absence of even the slightest doubt. Why do people say "I am innocent " must be considered such, but who says "I am guilty " must be immediately killed and tortured. Why justice is only for offenders who say they are innocent, that does not confess, that do not yield. The Franzoni. The Knox. Yet the question should be, by the actions of his uncle. Why, or is there something in, or is it really the murderess most stupid I have ever trod this planet. The question must arise. As the doubt must arise in the fait accompli. It's called rape, after death? A corpse can not say no or yes, it is an object. As a sofa. We can talk about the rape of a sofa if I sit there without him to be okay? So it is just vilipedio a corpse in the end. Murder and outrage. Like dozens of drunk novice boys who pull in people and leave a die coated with asphalt. Boys are definitely a subset of children who are now all vindictive on Facebook. The same. In the end it all comes down to actions and logical consequences, logical that in such a situation, and in many other similar, there is in any way. There is no inconsistency, no, but the rules of logic change. No one knows how, nobody knows why. It can be concluded with a final note on the logic of the law is a more severe punishment for rape and murder or homicide and contempt of a corpse? The end result is the same, but the second choice is much easier to put into practice not to mention that, from a practical point, is much less painful for the victim, then the punishment should be milder. Practical life does not follow the rules commutative algebra. And the law?
0 comments:
Post a Comment