I do not know how the quantum physics, I never had the opportunity (desire) to deepen. So the gap in advance of my speech. Hello. Time: generating random numbers with a computer you can see perfectly well that the case does not exist. Sure, the numbers are generated by computer algorithms, so I'm not really deterministic random numbers. Knowing the initial data of the machine, we could predict the number. So I looked for a better example of randomness. The traditional currency, the classic dice. Nothing. Knowing all the data (force of the launch, spin, trajectory, distance from the table, the length of the beard of God) can predict the exact output of the result. Difficult but possible. Nothing doing, the case can not occur, every example that I remember the mind is nothing but a complication that requires endless parameters (number of players, number of shoes of Abraham, number of partners of Paris Hilton) but never comes to be truly random. So the randomness is actually a word likely to mask laziness or ignorance.
Someone: What day is it today?
Injo : It's random. Someone
: Could you look on the calendar?
Injo : Can not predict it.
But even then the human being could be like a machine, a computer is extremely complex and with the greatest needs to connect to other computers via external connectors and the appropriate ports. Our brains may be simply a mass of logic statements that meet strict an external input in a predetermined way. Goodbye free will, the miracle of life goodbye. The world is undergoing stimuli our bodies, our bodies communicate with the brain that reacts in a way difficult to predict, but predictable once in possession of the right data and creates new challenges, creating an infinite loop. Everything we do, we have done and will do is predetermined by the logical structure of our brain structure created by the biological phenomena that occurred during our growth and thus determined by the rigid laws of chemistry and physics. Then they fall in the toilet all religious theories. And with all their ideas wonderfully hypocritical that a robot could never paint the Mona Lisa or composing a symphony Beethoven. Illusion. Under the right stimuli input could do this and more. Building the inventions of John Muciaccia and example. Rationally judge the work of Berlusconi, for example. I would do something unexpected to nip this theory, but anything I can think is, in fact, generated from my mind, be included in the general idea of \u200b\u200bthe speech. And, thanks to the impossibility of going back in time, you can not see if the same input may produce different effects under the same conditions. Bad news for those who believe they can write their own destiny by itself, although this phrase seems to be taking some manga. We are all particles that make what they are programmed, maybe we are a large sub-computer. The computer of God who apparently did not even put a virus. But there's good news: to get past the Turing test will now be much easier.
Someone: What day is it today?
Injo : It's random. Someone
: Could you look on the calendar?
Injo : Can not predict it.
But even then the human being could be like a machine, a computer is extremely complex and with the greatest needs to connect to other computers via external connectors and the appropriate ports. Our brains may be simply a mass of logic statements that meet strict an external input in a predetermined way. Goodbye free will, the miracle of life goodbye. The world is undergoing stimuli our bodies, our bodies communicate with the brain that reacts in a way difficult to predict, but predictable once in possession of the right data and creates new challenges, creating an infinite loop. Everything we do, we have done and will do is predetermined by the logical structure of our brain structure created by the biological phenomena that occurred during our growth and thus determined by the rigid laws of chemistry and physics. Then they fall in the toilet all religious theories. And with all their ideas wonderfully hypocritical that a robot could never paint the Mona Lisa or composing a symphony Beethoven. Illusion. Under the right stimuli input could do this and more. Building the inventions of John Muciaccia and example. Rationally judge the work of Berlusconi, for example. I would do something unexpected to nip this theory, but anything I can think is, in fact, generated from my mind, be included in the general idea of \u200b\u200bthe speech. And, thanks to the impossibility of going back in time, you can not see if the same input may produce different effects under the same conditions. Bad news for those who believe they can write their own destiny by itself, although this phrase seems to be taking some manga. We are all particles that make what they are programmed, maybe we are a large sub-computer. The computer of God who apparently did not even put a virus. But there's good news: to get past the Turing test will now be much easier.
0 comments:
Post a Comment